-1 for me. Could come with a lot of issues for the server and it’s reputation. Also could just make a lot of people uncomfortable to have irl adults roleplaying as a 3 year old (makes me uncomfortable). I believe kids below 3 are custom items? If so I’m all for that, could lead to cool rp (as an item, not a real human behind it-).

ZaciZach said:

-1

I admittedly don't trust 85% of the community to not immediately traumatize these children, or play them appropriately

Click to expand...

Yeah. i think the best solution, if was something u can apply, and also only with a high reputation. this to play correctly, but the other one

_Wachin_ said:

-1 for me. Could come with a lot of issues for the server and it’s reputation. Also could just make a lot of people uncomfortable to have irl adults roleplaying as a 3 year old (makes me uncomfortable). I believe kids below 3 are custom items? If so I’m all for that, could lead to cool rp (as an item, not a real human behind it-).

Click to expand...

3 years or less are custom. I said like 4 or 5 and higher, but i understand

No one would rp out properly being a child

-1. This can lead to some disgusting stuff, ngl. I don't see the need as this is not a CityRP

-1 There’s really no point

-1, we already have too many issues and this would just add more.

-1, No.

With all due respect, it won't work. People will go against the rules and use the factor of its a Child behaviour. There's no point in having a child whitelist when there's no possible roleplay scenarios that can be implemented.

-1
no.

-1
this is just a weird thing to want them to add.

milkyram said:

-1
this is just a weird thing to want them to add.

Click to expand...

wouldn't be weird, if people wouldn't fail use it, and doesnt make these problems. Its weird cause people make weird, unfortunetly </3, :(

milkyram said:

-1
this is just a weird thing to want them to add.

Click to expand...

i wanted not just internet, but the world was a better place

-1
no

milkyram said:

-1
this is just a weird thing to want them to add.

Click to expand...

I completely agree with your opinion my friend.

caviive said:

I completely agree with your opinion my friend.

Click to expand...

I gave so much info to not be weird, i disagree

-1
I can see multiple issues with this. But the biggest thing for me is that it's just plain weird, I don't think I'd want to roleplay with people who'd pay to RP as a child in the first place, it just doesn't sit right with me....

WhiteSnowy1737 said:

I gave so much info to not be weird, i disagree

Click to expand...

You have all rights to disagree, but by making this post in the first place you already said you agreed to this idea, so there's no need in saying it again and again.

-1
No hard feelings! This just doesn’t seem like the right community for child roleplay. SchoolRP is a heavy, intense scene for many. Implementing children into the cruelness of the city wouldnt line up. @ZaciZach mentioned how people would traumatize them—and I wholeheartedly agree. Children are difficult to piece together overall. And, let’s face it, it would be terribly frustrating. People might not know how children /truly/ act, and that can lead to some.. Unrealistic roleplay situations. For example—people make their 13-15 y/o characters act like literal babies. Unless some of you acted like “goo goo gaa gaa” in middle school, I don’t think having an actual child whitelist would be any better. We are already a little off behaviour-wise. The disruption this would bring to the server is also INSANE! While I, personally, would love to see this work out in a server, SRP is just not the right one. The concept is amazing, but it doesn’t serve benefit.

If you truly struggle with that 25 -> 30 roleplay, I suggest /it roleplay. I know that sounds so dumb, but it can somewhat help to compose a sense of a kid.

/it Little baby Bartholomewing broke out into a flurry of a tantrum.

Or, if you’re going toddler-esque,

/it Bartholomewing waddled across the floor mindlessly, gnawing at the arm of the couch.

There’s just times where you have to accept that concepts may sound delightful at first, but the implementing of it will be nothing but trouble to the other people who share the server experience with you.

Lots of love. Props for taking the time to write the suggestion.

WhiteSnowy1737 said:

I gave so much info to not be weird, i disagree

Click to expand...

and I disagree with you. moving on :)