The scenario you've put is one possible scenario from many others. I already can see how other scenarios can go bad from this rule
I'm giving you an example, the rule "Agree OOCly you won't scam"... Do not make up a scenario- try to take a quick scenario from a thing that occurred from the rule...
I do agree with this and partly agree with the suggestion. I want street fights and brawls to increase and be fun rather than fear but I just think creating a problem to solve another isn't how it should be
I did, but I have the same concern about the OOC fear still. And if you read above I also said it's making the same problem as "Agree that you won't scam me if I buy from you" and when we used not to be able to lie on that people kept asking always and when you admit you're going to scam their...
I think it's realistic for who you knocked out to try to get back at you and maybe carve or do something more major... Knocking out doesn't grant KPs by the way
You're right, but this doesn't solve the reasons I disagree. It will still make a "blockade" obviously because if a party doesn't agree for no perms the other will probably try to run from the fight or avoid doing something major which still makes it less likely for permissions to be taken...
Yes and that's what I'm saying it will just make a problem and a blockade to GangRP. Fearing for something to happen from the fight should be kept ICly not OOCly
It's just like "fearing for further consequences" from doing that and that
Yeah but people will just go in all fights agree no perms and if the "One party" doesn't agree they will just avoid the fight out of fear which not only all should be kept ICly but will make it less likely for GangRPers to gain permissions.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.