Animal rolls

[Kalyn Caldwell]

Hello! I know I have made previous threads and they were dumb.

But today I thought that animals when a dog is trying to intimidate a human by growling dogs can roll 100 and humans 150. And honestly I think that is a little unfair since they can possibly get higher when a dog is being threatening and that they should roll the same as animals just to make it more fair.
For instance

/me would bare teeth at the human while growling as her fur would stand up on her neck.
/roll 100
Then the human should roll 100 as well because its more fair.

 

[Tippie]

Rolling to intimidate isn't allowed without OOC consent in the first place. The rolling amounts do make sense as a human is (on average) stronger then an animal.

 

[HATOLA]

-1

 

[pashy]

-1
Humans to breath underwater so dogs cookies get popular, yk...​

 

[toranekos]

-1
Animals shouldn't be on par with humans -
This also concerns the age rolling system.. If you growl at a 14 year old they are much more likely to be scared rather than someone who is perhaps 30 - that's why their rolls are different in total value. Of course, it depends on the player - but as Tippie said above, rolling to intimidate isn't a mandatory roleplay function - rather discussed OOCly beforehand.
​

 

[Gunna!]

-1
seems pointless ​

 

[Kalyn Caldwell]

Yeahh- just forget about it.

 

[KimiNoUso]

Denied​