IGN: Poseter
DATE: 9/24/2023
WHAT YOU WANT TO SUGGEST OR MENTION: Apartment and property co-owner
HOW WILL THIS BENEFIT THE SERVER/COMMUNITY?: Properties have admin but do not have a co-owner. I feel it would be beneficial because, for those who buy a house to own it together, only one person can run it. If multiple people were to move in and decorate their own rooms or something within the property and the owner of the house was not online at the time, the person who has a co-owner could add them as an editor and remove it.
A few examples of why a co-owner would be beneficial would be:
1. If someone were to begin breaking things they weren't supposed to whilst the owner was offline, then the co-owner would be able to remove them as an editor.
2. If someone were to be an admin or need it removed, the co-owner could do so quickly without having the owner within the property or online.
3. If the owner were gone for a long period of time, the co-owner could maintain the property in their absence.
4. There can be a limit to the amount of co-owner slots available. This can be 2 because it's more security for the property.
5. The co-owner may pay someone for a build or a service, and if the owner is unable to log on or come to the property, the co-owner can watch over the person.
6. This can allow sports housing to have the co-captain (or whatever it's called) access to the house, allowing the new player to gain edit perms if the captain was unable to.
7. This could help the skill diversity greatly as the co-owner and the owner would have different mindsets.
Overall, the idea of adding a co-owner to a property can lessen the amount of people buying properties. This will help because those who have co-ownership may not want to buy another property because they basically already have their own. Conflict can be easily solved, problems can be resolved, and edit perms arguments can be lessened.
DATE: 9/24/2023
WHAT YOU WANT TO SUGGEST OR MENTION: Apartment and property co-owner
HOW WILL THIS BENEFIT THE SERVER/COMMUNITY?: Properties have admin but do not have a co-owner. I feel it would be beneficial because, for those who buy a house to own it together, only one person can run it. If multiple people were to move in and decorate their own rooms or something within the property and the owner of the house was not online at the time, the person who has a co-owner could add them as an editor and remove it.
A few examples of why a co-owner would be beneficial would be:
1. If someone were to begin breaking things they weren't supposed to whilst the owner was offline, then the co-owner would be able to remove them as an editor.
2. If someone were to be an admin or need it removed, the co-owner could do so quickly without having the owner within the property or online.
3. If the owner were gone for a long period of time, the co-owner could maintain the property in their absence.
4. There can be a limit to the amount of co-owner slots available. This can be 2 because it's more security for the property.
5. The co-owner may pay someone for a build or a service, and if the owner is unable to log on or come to the property, the co-owner can watch over the person.
6. This can allow sports housing to have the co-captain (or whatever it's called) access to the house, allowing the new player to gain edit perms if the captain was unable to.
7. This could help the skill diversity greatly as the co-owner and the owner would have different mindsets.
Overall, the idea of adding a co-owner to a property can lessen the amount of people buying properties. This will help because those who have co-ownership may not want to buy another property because they basically already have their own. Conflict can be easily solved, problems can be resolved, and edit perms arguments can be lessened.
