Well, I agree with that last remark, which explains why so few individuals were aware of the regulation. Staff are now making sure that people KNOW it's a rule, and I've seen them tell people in OOC chat since the new building and houses and whatnot came to life. I only knew it was a rule because I was curious about the maximum number of units one could buy, and that inquiry was addressed in 2020. I'm not sure why some folks got away with it and others didn't.
Here is a quick scenario for ya though!
Let's imagine these houses go on sale at 1 a.m. or later in your timezone, and you don't have any pals online or anyone who can keep the goods for you! Given that you may have more than ten double chests in your current residence? Considering how your alts won't be able to hold everything, or how you won't be able to play two minecrafts at the same time without crashing everything! [This is my problem.] I don't see why buying the house on an alt would be a problem in this given moment, especially if that person can play more than two minecrafts. Then disown the other apartment after you've moved the goods. Simple! Exactly like that. Let's have a look at the advantages of doing so:
- You don't have to worry about having your things stolen
- Someone who can't afford the houses being put for sale can buy that apartment you just disowned
- Avoid a warn (by NOT disowning the apartment)
But like I said before, my opinion on this is
neutral, I'm not taking any side here, I'm for AND against it.
Now let's look at another scenario!
Let's pretend this was permitted, and you could only possess the two housing/apartments blah blah for a certain time in order to relocate your belongings. The administration puts trust in the community as a whole to handle this appropriately. It is commonly known that not everyone on srp has a mature mentality. Someone takes advantage of the staff team's trust and decides to keep both apartments/housing. Seeing that humans will always have a bit of greed in them. Now we move onto why this is bad;
- It keeps one less person from having a place to store things
- Taking advantage of the staff team's generosity
- Being greedy and immature
- Basically lying in a way
If they are now claiming that this rule is new, I don't think they realized it was a rule in the past. It wasn't discussed in the rules thread or put OUT there, so no one can blame them.
Also! Nobody knew the houses would be available for purchase again, or that there would be a complex H. How could anyone relocate their belongings ahead of time if half of the community was shocked by the announcements? As a result, it isn't truly their fault. Whether or not it was their responsibility, they made it obvious that they were unaware of it in the first place and that they had pointed it out multiple times, and that is all they are attempting to say. It's very understandable. I didn't want a house or anything, but I too did not know about the new complex or the houses.
People knew there was going to be a new building but no one was told exactly when this was going to happen.