Younger Ages

[Mircegg]

What's your Minecraft Username?: Mircegg
What's the title of your suggestion?: Younger Ages

What's your suggestion?:
My suggestion is that we can make characters younger than 13. Maybe we could have a baby rank or a kid rank, which would be before you go to school.

How will this benefit the server and community?:
This change could benefit the server and community by allowing players to RP as any age, creating more roleplay opportunities.

 

[Infi]

nope

 

[Arocatula]

-1
I don’t want a baby rank when I make a new character, most people want to go straight to school roleplaying when they first join the server. Though that might not be a huge problem, ages below 13 and above about 4 years means primary school, and that would be a whole ordeal. I also don’t see any age below 13 having any “unique” opportunities, they can’t get jobs, they can’t go to high school, and it would in fact just make role playing more limited for them.

 

[ilovemyplane]

There have been many, and I mean many, requests for a younger age, but they’ve all been denied by staff. So this is going to be a -1 from me, nothing personal though :thumbsup:

 

[The FJ]

lol we can't even trust half the server with 14 yros

 

[AirconUnit]

-1. I know what you mean by more roleplay opportunities, Mainly in families. There is many problems with this however some more obvious than others. This has been suggested many times and been denied for the same version, If your character has children that are babies then simply Item roleplay it like the rest :)

 

[philbertman42]

There aren't any facilities for children, and implementing any for them would require taking attention and resources from the main focus of the server, that being the highschool and college.

Also I don't trust the majority of the server to roleplay as / with children responsibly.

 

[cho0ii]

nuhuh

 

[DarkEclipic]

-1
no it has been denied SEVERAL times before and KimiNoUso has said SEVERAL times that we are not going to be getting younger ages lower than 13

 

[Joe.exe]

I don't know how many times similar suggestions have been made, I would guess 5 times, but they have been rejected every time.

 

[Mircegg]

-1
no it has been denied SEVERAL times before and KimiNoUso has said SEVERAL times that we are not going to be getting younger ages lower than 13

idk i js thought i might give it a try of asking

 

[wethecreature]

lol we can't even trust half the server with 14 yros

this is honestly true... the amount of green tag characters that act like infants themselves is... off-putting

 

[Customable]

This has been denied 3 times before and with good reason.

 

[kustomzero]

Nuh uh

 

[adalynoc]

absolutely not.

 

[_BritishAutism_]

-1 The rule breakers would take advantage of this... the thought of it makes me uncomfortable.

 

[Mircegg]

After reconsidering, I've realized it's a bad idea due to failrpers. I'm now against it.

 

[stormii]

-1

As several people have said, this has been denied three separate times and for good reason. Plus, you can sort of "roleplay" as younger characters already, it's a difficult concept to explain.

 

[SirDerpHead]

-1
I dont think I even have to say why...

 

[Squidjees]

-1