Yea i realised that after i posted it . . . it's a bit too long-1 partially cause i think i got brain damage from reading that
future major suggestions will get their own post, smaller changes will be thrown into 1 big msg
Unnecessary, i don't really know about that. Unneeded, yes. I agree on that, none of these changes are 100% mandetory to make the game instantly better, it are just fixed or add ons that I THINK would help further improve the already GOOD systemi just think a lot of these are unnecessary and uneeded.
You sadly do, for the weapons that cannot be mugged out of the hand you need to stab / cut the hand in which they are holding the weapon, this isn't directly stated in the rules (which is why i want the rulebook to be updated) but more so in the weapon profiles. You would need majors to disarm someone of their weapon, which seems logical since you would get majors if they threaten you with a weapon out or they attack you with a weapon, but then again as I said in 1.3, it's a bit useless seeing as how you can KO a player to THEN still major them and take another limbNO MAJORS OPTION -- You don't need majors to disarm somebody, at least, it's not noted anywhere in the rules. You simply need to action to disarm somebody, though if there is a rule written down somewhere, feel free to correct me. The fact that it isn't written down anywhere means your suggestion technically already is implemented.
Only with muggable weapons (I.O.W: bats, crowbar, fireaxe, Tactical knife)NON-HARMFUL DISARMING -- See my 'No Majors' comment. You can already do this (unless you can't, in which case I'm wrong and am making a fool of myself, as one usually does).
You don't really seem negative, just more serious since you have actual arguments and reasonings for your points, which I respect, since as i stated at the beginning of the Paragraph, I Want feedback on this, as long as it is properly built up with arguments and reasoningsI know it seems like I'm a bit negative, but I really do appreciate the thought put into this. Keep it up, can't wait to see more.
As i said before in this reply, i'll make the more bigger changes, suggestions and ideas into their own thread. for all that i know right now these are more of the ruleset suggestions, next suggestion thread(s) are about some KPD suggestionswon't be adding a +1 or -1 since I consider these numbers arbitrary and I don't believe in that these kinds of arguments can be boiled down to two or three numbers. This isn't a suggestion in the same vein as a new building or role, this is an amendment to the rulesets that needs to be properly discussed before being ruled on.